Skip to content

Conversation

@Earlopain
Copy link
Contributor

@Earlopain Earlopain commented Oct 16, 2025

User description

This new version was just released and hopefully contains a fix for the build failure.

I did not manage to reproduce it locally, so I want to see what CI has to say about it.

🔗 Related Issues

Followup to #16437

🔄 Types of changes

  • Chore

PR Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Bump prism gem from 1.4.0 to 1.6.0

  • Remove version constraint that blocked prism 1.5+

  • Resolve build failure with newer prism versions


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["prism 1.4.0<br/>with version constraint"] -- "Update dependency" --> B["prism 1.6.0<br/>no constraint"]
  C["Build failure<br/>in prism 1.5+"] -- "Fixed in 1.6.0" --> B
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Dependencies
MODULE.bazel
Update prism version hash in Bazel                                             

MODULE.bazel

  • Updated prism dependency hash from 1.4.0 to 1.6.0
  • Changed hash value to reflect new version
+1/-1     
Gemfile
Remove prism version constraint                                                   

rb/Gemfile

  • Removed version constraint limiting prism to < 1.5
  • Removed associated comment about build error
  • Allows prism 1.6.0 to be used
+0/-4     

This new version was just released and hopefully contains a fix for the build failure
@selenium-ci selenium-ci added C-rb Ruby Bindings B-build Includes scripting, bazel and CI integrations labels Oct 16, 2025
@qodo-merge-pro
Copy link
Contributor

qodo-merge-pro bot commented Oct 16, 2025

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
- [ ] Create ticket/issue <!-- /create_ticket --create_ticket=true -->

</details></td></tr>
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
No custom compliance provided

Follow the guide to enable custom compliance check.

  • Update
Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

@qodo-merge-pro
Copy link
Contributor

qodo-merge-pro bot commented Oct 16, 2025

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

@cgoldberg
Copy link
Member

I want to see what CI has to say about it.

it's running now

@Earlopain
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks. Build seems to pass now

This was referenced Oct 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

B-build Includes scripting, bazel and CI integrations C-rb Ruby Bindings Review effort 1/5

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants